<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>warmed-over soapboxes &#187; Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/tag/republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox</link>
	<description>clever would be nice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In which my liberal card is revoked</title>
		<link>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2011/11/liberal-card/</link>
		<comments>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2011/11/liberal-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chelsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/?p=2113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that everyone with income should pay federal income tax. This is a pretty unpopular opinion in liberal circles, and a wildly popular opinion in conservative ones, so I will explain, so as to make both camps unhappy with me. (Ah, well.) According to the Tax Policy Center, there are 151 million tax units [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that everyone with income should pay federal income tax. This is a pretty unpopular opinion in liberal circles, and a wildly popular opinion in conservative ones, so I will explain, so as to make both camps unhappy with me.</p>
<p>(Ah, well.)</p>
<p>According to the Tax Policy Center, there are 151 million tax units (singles, couples, families) in the U.S., of which around <a title="source: Tax Policy Center 2009 data" href="http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?DocID=2701">48% </a>do not pay individual income tax. About <a title="source: factcheck.org" href="http://www.factcheck.org/2008/11/americans-paying-no-taxes/">60% of those people make under $20,000 a year</a>, which is below the poverty level (and also awful and sad). By my calculations &#8212; and I am no mathematician &#8212; this means there are around 44 million tax units not paying federal income taxes, the majority of whom cannot really afford to.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s where you take away my liberal card.</p>
<p>I call bullshit: fixed income or not, poverty or not, I think every household can save a few cents a month and pay some federal taxes. If every tax unit saved $0.83 per month, which is to say that they paid $10 per year in income tax, that would add <em>at least</em> $440 million to the federal budget (hopefully more; the 40% making above poverty level might be able to contribute $1 per month, say). Sure, when the U.S. budget is projected to be $3.729 trillion in 2012, this is the tiniest fraction (.001 percent, right? again, <em>not a math person</em>) of the budget. But this amount of income does two things:</p>
<p>First of all, it gives <em>everyone</em> ownership of what happens in America. It means if you have income, your tax dollars &#8212; or cents, as it may be &#8212; aren&#8217;t just going to entitlement programs like SS and Medicare; it means they&#8217;re going to defense, environmental protection, emergency funding, world aid, etc. So if you didn&#8217;t pay taxes before and felt like you had no say in where your dollars were spent because your dollars <em>weren&#8217;t</em> spent, now you have no excuse. No longer do you have to feel inadequate when your GOP representative denigrates your income class to the country; now you can stand up and say, &#8220;Hey, shut up. I pay taxes too, though I can little afford it. This is my country and I&#8217;m giving and taking like everyone else.&#8221; Maybe it would even compel some people, who may have felt unworthy of voting before, to get out and vote.</p>
<p>Second, and most important, it would make the right-wingers STFU about how 50 percent of Americans pay no taxes. Hell, even crazy right-wing tea-nut Michele Bachmann has said that <a title="source: slate.com" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2302131/">a dollar would be good enough</a> for her, so let&#8217;s add an order of magnitude and take away a huge Republican talking point.</p>
<p>Best of all, once everyone who produces income is paying taxes, the GOP&#8217;s message that it&#8217;s okay to increase taxes on the poor but not the rich is severely undermined.</p>
<p>Caveat: Here&#8217;s what I don&#8217;t know: I don&#8217;t know how much it costs the Internal Revenue Service to review each tax statement. Maybe there&#8217;s a negative ROI on paying such low taxes, though the liberal in me would love to see the rhetorical knots Republicans twist themselves into explaining why it&#8217;s <em>bad</em> for poor people to pay taxes. I also don&#8217;t know exactly how to address income vs. capital gains, as well as people receiving Social Security. So this argument is incomplete with parts that I&#8217;m not prepared to deal with. (Work in progress, people. Work in progress.)</p>
<p>Yet while I hate to see the working class get nickel-and-dimed more (literally, in my projection), provided that the cost of processing these returns doesn&#8217;t make it negative, I think it&#8217;s well worth the cost of ownership of the country.</p>
<p>Suck it, Red.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2011/11/liberal-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skunks vs. Porcupines</title>
		<link>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2011/02/skunks-vs-porcupines-2/</link>
		<comments>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2011/02/skunks-vs-porcupines-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chelsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions on childish things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/?p=2003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s say there are two political parties whose symbols are, for example, skunks and porcupines &#8212; both indigenous to North America, both with few predators save the occasional lost mama grizzly bear wandering down from Alaska. Now say you used to think the Skunk party was the one that was True and Good and Right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s say there are two political parties whose symbols are, for example, skunks and porcupines &#8212; both indigenous to North America, both with few predators save the occasional lost mama grizzly bear wandering down from Alaska. Now say you used to think the Skunk party was the one that was True and Good and Right and that Porcupines were gnawing apart the Fabric of Society, but evidence and experience and, well, logic led you, in the end, to actually prefer the spiny side. Say you marry and your husband &#8212; who dabbled in Red Fox philosophy for a bit in college &#8212; has had a similar experience: Both of you come from families of hardcore Skunks, and both families don&#8217;t quite understand why you prefer the herbivorous rodent philosophy to its odiferous counterpart.</p>
<p>You have nothing against Skunks, per se; you think some of their ideas are okay, although they seem a bit too black and white for your taste (you believe the quill is mightier than the anal gland, for example), but the Skunks you grew up with were wonderful people and you bear none of them any personal ill will. In the end, both are trying to coexist in the same general habitat even though they have quite different ways of expressing themselves.</p>
<p>So would you be <em>at all suspicious</em> when your families keep giving your child textiles with skunks on them? Bath towels, blankets, and shirts? Is this some sneaky rhetorical persuasion they&#8217;re attempting? Or do porcupines simply not have the same childish appeal and family values as their symbolic counterparts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2011/02/skunks-vs-porcupines-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On why I won&#8217;t be inviting anyone over any time in the near future</title>
		<link>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2009/09/kablooey/</link>
		<comments>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2009/09/kablooey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chelsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's speech to high schoolers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/?p=1319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today, I was all hacked off about this story in the NYT about parents (many in Texas, surprise surprise) who don&#8217;t want their children to listen to Obama&#8217;s upcoming speech for high schoolers. Apparently those parts about responsibility, staying in school, and working hard? Those are socialist talking points!  “I don’t want our schools [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today, I was all hacked off about <a title="srsly?" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/04/us/04school.html?hp">this story</a> in the NYT about parents (many in Texas, surprise surprise) who don&#8217;t want their children to listen to Obama&#8217;s upcoming speech for high schoolers. Apparently those parts about responsibility, staying in school, and working hard? Those are socialist talking points!  “I don’t want our schools turned over to some socialist movement,&#8221; said one parent of a child WHO GOES TO A PUBLIC SCHOOL.</p>
<p>And I was thinking, OH MY GODS. You people are close-minded idiots. God forbid anyone runs into an idea that she or he might disagree with. THE WORLD, IT WOULD END &#8212; <em><strong>KABLOOEY!</strong></em></p>
<p>I tell you this to illustrate the type of grumbly mood I was in all afternoon. And then, completely unrelated to politics, tonight happened.</p>
<p>Seriously, you people who have children? WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?!</p>
<p>You know what my damn dog does when we get her a nice, plush new bed? SHE PEES ON IT. Do you know what she does on the carpet as I&#8217;m opening the back door to let her out? SHE PEES ON IT. Do you know what she does when I only let her out onto the deck instead of taking her all the way down the stairs? SHE PEES ON IT.</p>
<p>Have gone through half a liter of Woolite Carpet Stain &amp; Pet Odor Remover (With Oxygen!), gallons of water, and all of my nerves. Currently, Lucy is snoozing in her crate and I&#8217;m drinking beer. God bless Wailua Wheat and its Passion Fruity goodness.</p>
<p>Goodnight, and good luck to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2009/09/kablooey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

