<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>warmed-over soapboxes &#187; NFL divisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/tag/nfl-divisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox</link>
	<description>clever would be nice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking down the NFL divisions, geography style</title>
		<link>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2009/11/nfl-geography/</link>
		<comments>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2009/11/nfl-geography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chelsey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL divisions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/?p=1477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well. The Broncos are playing the Chargers, and I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m wishing Kyle Orton &#8212; Kyle Orton! &#8212; were starting for Denver. So&#8230;while I am nominally watching the game (Broncos are down 7-0 as I write), allow me to wax practical on the current geographic NFL divisions. Suffice it to say, the current divisions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. The Broncos are playing the Chargers, and I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m wishing Kyle Orton &#8212; Kyle Orton! &#8212; were starting for Denver. So&#8230;while I am nominally watching the game (Broncos are down 7-0 as I write), allow me to wax practical on the current geographic NFL divisions. Suffice it to say, the current divisions are very geographically inefficient, as you can see below:</p>
<div id="attachment_1478" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 543px"><a href="http://images.cbssports.com/images/nfl/teams_map.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1478    " title="Current NFL divisions" src="http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nfl-teams-current.JPG" alt="Original image from CBSsports.com" width="533" height="355" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Color key: Red = west teams, green = north, blue = south, purple = east</p></div>
<p>It is ridiculous that Minnesota, Dallas, and Houston are all farther west than St. Louis, yet St. Louis is in the NFC <em>West</em> division. Speaking of Dallas, it&#8217;s in the NFC <em>East </em>division, and Miami, the southernmost team, is equally ridiculously grouped with three northeastern teams. And just look at how much travel must be done within the two western conferences as compared to, say, the NFC or AFC North teams.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying the geography and resulting travel time matter a great deal, but if it did &#8212; say for energy conservation reasons, or just the general fairness of teams having unequal travelling time &#8212; what could the divisions look like? Here are a few options:</p>
<p>1. Geographically efficient.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1481" title="nfl teams opt 1" src="http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nfl-teams-opt-1.bmp" alt="nfl teams opt 1" width="533" height="355" /></p>
<p>There is no perfect layout, but this is one of the most geographically efficient. (One team in the west sticks out like a sore thumb no matter how you lay it out.)</p>
<p>2. Nice and neat&#8230;except the northwest.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1482" title="nfl teams opt 2" src="http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nfl-teams-opt-2.bmp" alt="nfl teams opt 2" width="518" height="344" />3. Preservation<br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1483" title="nfl teams opt 3" src="http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nfl-teams-opt-3.bmp" alt="nfl teams opt 3" width="518" height="344" />This preserves the idea of North/South/East/West conferences in a way the first option doesn&#8217;t, and it also preserves some divisional rivalries, such as DEN-OAK-KC, MIN-GB-CHI, CLE-CIN, WASH-PHIL, BUF-NYJ-NE, and CAR-ATL.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">4. Longitude:<br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1480" title="nfl teams opt 4" src="http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nfl-teams-opt-4.bmp" alt="nfl teams opt 4" width="518" height="344" /><br />
If we&#8217;re just going by longitude &#8212; and I see no reason to do so; this is just for curiosity &#8212; this is how it would break down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chelseywaters.com/soapbox/2009/11/nfl-geography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

